Strauss Kahn Shift by Adeyemi Oshunrinade


20111227-170603.jpg

20111227-162822.jpg

The prosecutor handling the Strauss Kahn saga recently announced a shift in the case, based on the credibility of his accuser which led to his temporary release from jail and his bail money returned pending further investigation. Whether Strauss Kahn is innocent or not was based on the facts and evidence in the case.

While the court and the justice system may have applied the accuser’s credibility in deciding the case, such use of credibility must have been linked to the evidences and facts of the case.

Attacking he accuser’s credibility based on her immigration application and statements made in her filings, which are not closely linked to the evidences of the case would have shown a miscarriage of justice.

However, information such as her statement that she was once gang-raped and the discovery she lied under oath, was crucial credibility issues if put into consideration in deciding her case, as these are closely related to the charges against the IMF chief.

Nonetheless, issues related to her tax return may have been deemed not proper or applicable as evidence.

A key evidence that probably damaged the accuser was her false statement to the grand jury and her admission she cleaned a nearby room and then returned to Strauss Kahn’s suite to start cleaning before reporting the incident. This allowed the defense to claim she attempted to clean up evidence in the process.

Meanwhile, a civil law suit is not ruled out in this case; the fact that DSK escaped criminal prosecution does not mean he would prevail in a civil suit.

I welcome all comments on this issue.

Advertisements


Categories: Criminal Law

Tags: ,

2 replies

  1. Money moves the world…! DSK’s money can buy very, very good lawyers. Money make the supposed victim to loose her mind… Who knows the truth? Perhaps it doesn’t matter… We all know that ‘Justice’ and ‘Truth’ are note the same.
    Forgiveness for my English.

    Like

    • Thank you Javier I do agree with you that DSK was able to hire good counsel however, there are cases in the US where the defendant is insolvent but still able to get the best legal defense team paid for by the government; see for example the just concluded Casey Anthoney case, you can read my blog on it meanwhile, I must say your English is good I can understand everything.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: